Consumers assume their prospective insurance producer is duly licensed and trustworthy – after all, why else would that person be trusted to sell insurance and scope out someone’s financial situation?
However, the reality is that most states don’t have statutes mandating any sort of background check or screening for a producer’s insurance compliance, or standards set for who’s chiefly responsible for conducting them.
So, what’s the deal? Who’s responsible? You won’t be surprised to know it varies by state, so be sure to do your due diligence in whatever jurisdictions you operate in. However, the following is a general lay of the land when it comes to insurance background check requirements.

Photo by Meg Jenson on Unsplash
State insurance license background checks
An insurance producer background check is a review of an applicant’s criminal history and other licensing-related information required by many state insurance departments and, in some cases, insurance carriers before a producer can become licensed or appointed.
Most states’ insurance licensing processes include fingerprinting and some sort of basic state-level background check, even if it’s not wholly enshrined in state legislation.
For a first insurance license in most states, the producer will get a basic fingerprint scan as well as having their name run through state databases for basic information such as pending litigation or criminal history. Some states exempt nonresident licensees from this process, and some states require either by law or by process that insurance licensees do this for the acquisition of every new line of authority.
The variation here is familiar, as many state governments are straddling manual and digital technologies – some states’ regulators only allow you to submit digital prints, some stipulate a preferred fingerprint provider.
NAIC criminal history check model legislation
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has model legislation for just about everything. The NAIC’s standards for fingerprinting and background checks can be found in their carefully crafted model on the “Authorization for Criminal History Record Check”. However, although many states have some kind of legislation, bulletin, or other regulatory procedure that addresses fingerprinting or background check requirements, few have actually adopted any version of the NAIC model.
So, while this is one area with little standardization, the NAIC’s Working Group dedicated to the question chugs on.
Insurer, agency, MGA background checks
Most insurance carriers, agencies, or managing general agent (MGA) organizations perform a background check when onboarding new agents, whether they’re employees or contractors. This makes a lot of sense: States have an interest in ensuring only trustworthy professionals work with the public because of a general interest in consumer protections. But agencies and carriers have financial liability for their appointed or affiliated producers, as well.
Remember, among thecommon reasons for an agent’s behavior to carry penalties, it’s not just the agent who may be in trouble. The agency, MGA, or insurer could also find themselves in regulatory hot water if someone in the line of command should have known that something shady was going on, or whether an agent had a likelihood of acting out.
While there’s no single standard for these various insurance stakeholders to follow, we see the accepted industry status quo reflected in the Securities and Insurance Licensing Association (SILA)’s Best Practices Handbook.
SILA background check commentary
In the Best Practices Handbook Chapter 2, “Agency-Carrier Preferred Workflow,” SILA addresses the responsibilities of background checks and due diligence when it comes to gatekeeping reputable professionals:
“It is unclear to what degree the enforcement arms of the state insurance departments will hold each business entity liable for the behavior and business practices of an agent/producer/broker. While many agencies perform due diligence in reviewing the background of agency employees/contractors, it is clear that the insurance industry in general has deemed the carrier to be primarily responsible for performing due diligence in investigating the individual for past indicators of unprofessional conduct.”
This would certainly lead readers to believe that, regardless of whether a state undertakes any amount of fingerprinting and background checks, carriers and MGAs acting in a carrier capacity should certainly have background checks built into their due diligence process for onboarding any agent, producer, or broker, regardless of whether they’re captive or independent.
What are you looking for?
As is evidenced in a SILA webinar, “Criminal History Background Screening Best Practices, there are a number of levels to any background check or criminal history validation, and a few competing priorities to juggle.
For one thing, some of the states with laws specifically governing insurance background checks spell out that they require validation of such basics as:
- Identity
- Residence
- Education and presented experience
- Character
- Financial history
You’ll likely also want to search a number of databases for a comprehensive view of a producer’s criminal or financial history. Most local and regional databases aren’t linked together – a simple search probably won’t yield the information you’re looking for.
So, you’re going to want to search:
- Local databases like county or municipal court records
- Credit reports
- National registries, such as accessible by the FBI
Best practices in insurance background checks
Before you give your onboarding producer the third degree, you’ll want to be sure your insurance organization follows best practices regarding background checks.
It’s important to remember that background checks and, in general, gathering information about someone’s criminal, financial, or professional history, aim to ensure the person is a capable, trustworthy person who won’t pose an outsized risk to your business or your clients.
While you want to do your due diligence in that regard, you also don’t want to end up violating their right to privacy, turning up information about them that can lead to real or perceived bias, or transgress their right to medical privacy. The bottom line is that you don’t want to do something intended to mitigate your risk that might instead increase your risk.
A few best practices suggestions in this regard:
- Ask for permission.
Be sure you disclose to any insurance producer candidates – or candidates for officer positions in your company, where applicable – what you’re looking for, why, and, as much as possible, how. You don’t want to violate the trust of a new employee, and they may voluntarily disclose information they know might come up, which could facilitate a frank and open discussion.
- Have an independent third party conduct the screening.
For one thing, you want to be more thorough than merely plugging a name into a search engine. Having an independent third party that’s experienced can ensure you have the widest or most relevant information. It also addresses the risk of exposing an insurance professional’s federally or state-protected personal information – experienced criminal search services will scrub the data before giving it to you.
- Allow a candidate to explain the results.
Life is complicated. Some states have clear lines regarding crimes that can exclude someone from eligibility to work on the sales end of the insurance industry. And often, searches will yield cases that settled, were dismissed, or are ongoing: cases where there’s no verdict rendered. In these cases, a person’s explanation may greatly affect whether your business is willing to consider completing the onboarding process. For instance, a financial professional who ended up in bankruptcy court may have done so because they were reckless risk-takers, or because life circumstances afforded them no other options, or because it happened before they had financial know-how and it was a learning experience and inspiration for them. You won’t know if you don’t ask.
A quick note on renewing your license with a criminal background
On the flip side, if you’re an individual with a somewhat checkered past looking to enter (or re-enter) the insurance industry as a licensed insurance producer, tracking down your resident state’s requirements can be quite the challenge. Lucky for you, we’ve already done the work!
Find out how to renew your insurance license with a criminal background in each state using the links below.
Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Arkansas | California | Colorado | | Connecticut | Delaware | Florida | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana | Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas | Utah | Vermont | Virginia | Washington | Washington, D.C. | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming
Insurance producers may have to undergo a background check and many layers of screening before they receive the greenlight to sell for any carrier or agency. From state-level screens to carriers, MGAs, or agency scrutiny, the amount of paperwork and validation checkpoints can be ubiquitous – practically criminal. Using technology and professional verification sources can make it a little less tedious, and more thorough, too.
Why Manual Compliance Creates Risk
As your insurance agency or carrier grows, tracking onboarding and background check requirements across dozens of states using spreadsheets or manual workflows increases the risk of missed licensing requirements, onboarding delays, and unnecessary administrative work.
AgentSync helps automate insurance producer onboarding, licensing workflows, carrier appointments, and ongoing compliance so your team can get producers ready to sell faster while reducing compliance risk.
To see how Agentsync’s producer management software can help make this a (relatively) painless process that rolls easily into the rest of your producer management system, including seamless background check partner integrations, check out a demo today.
FAQ
Do all states require insurance producer background checks?
Insurance producer background check requirements vary by state. Some states require fingerprint-based criminal background checks for resident license applicants, while others rely primarily on application disclosures unless additional review is needed. Always verify requirements with the appropriate state insurance department before submitting a licensing application.
Do insurance carriers conduct their own background checks?
Yes. Many insurance carriers perform additional background screenings as part of producer onboarding, even when state licensing requirements have already been satisfied. Carrier requirements may differ depending on the products offered, internal risk policies, and regulatory obligations.
Can someone with a criminal record obtain an insurance producer license?
Possibly. A criminal conviction does not automatically prevent someone from becoming a licensed insurance producer. State insurance departments generally evaluate factors such as the nature of the offense, how much time has passed, evidence of rehabilitation, and applicable state laws before making licensing decisions.
How can agencies manage different state background check requirements?
Many agencies use insurance compliance technology to automate producer onboarding, track state-specific licensing requirements, and monitor ongoing compliance. Automation reduces manual research and helps keep insurance producers on the right side of the law by meeting both regulatory and carrier requirements before selling insurance.
What’s the difference between state licensing requirements and carrier requirements?
State insurance departments establish the legal requirements for obtaining and maintaining an insurance producer license within the state. Insurance carriers may impose additional onboarding, contracting, or compliance standards before appointing producers to sell their products.